Dr Louise Whatford
Department: Pathobiology & Population Sciences,Pathobiology & Population Sciences
Campus: Hawkshead
Research Groups: Animal Welfare Science and Ethics, Sustainable Food Systems
Research Centres: RVC Animal Welfare Science and Ethics, Veterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health
Louise is a postdoctoral researcher in the Veterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group (VEEPH). She currently works on a project investigating sustainability in British sheep and beef food systems and is part of the Interdisciplinary Food Systems Teaching And Learning team
Louise graduated from the University of Bristol with a BSc in Animal Behaviour and Welfare. In 2019 she completed a PhD in epidemiology and microbiology that was interested in increasing our understanding of mastitis in sheep and developing strategies for its control. This has led to her interest in agriculture, livestock health and welfare and its links to sustainble food production, and interdisciplinary approaches to tackle questions.
Louise's research include inter- and transdisciplinary methods to understand more about sustainability in the beef and sheep food and marketing systems in Great Britain. She is particularly interested in animal welfare and integrating this into her research in sustainability and livestock food systems. She is also passionate about systems thinking being an active member of the Interdisciplinary Food Systems Teaching and Learning (IFSTAL) team and applying these approaches in her research.
Qi A, Whatford L, Payne-Gifford S, Cooke R, Van Winden S, Häsler B, Barling D. Can 100% Pasture-Based Livestock Farming Produce Enough Ruminant Meat to Meet the Current Consumption Demand in the UK? Grasses. 2023; 2(3):185-206. https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses2030015
Roshania, R.P., Yates, J., McIntyre, L., Chancellor, T., Fivian, E., Hill, M., Isoto, R., Marinda, P., Narayanan, S., Whatford, L. and Zotor, F., 2023. Assessing needs for interdisciplinarity in agriculture, nutrition, and health education. Global Food Security, 37, p.100691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2023.100691
Lanzoni, L., Whatford, L., Atzori, A., Chincarini, M., Giammarco, M., Fusaro, I. and Vignola, G., 2023. The challenge to integrate animal welfare indicators into the Life Cycle Assessment. animal, p.100794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2023.100794
Häsler, B., Queenan, K., Alarcon, P., Raj, E. and Whatford, L., 2023. Where One Health Meets Food Systems Teaching and Learning: Expanding Skillsets for Food System Transformation. One Health Cases, (2023), p.ohcs20230010. https://doi.org/10.1079/onehealthcases.2023.0010
Whatford, L., van Winden, S. and Häsler, B., 2022. A systematic literature review on the economic impact of endemic disease in UK sheep and cattle using a One Health conceptualisation. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, p.105756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105756
Fletcher, K.A., Limon, G., Whatford, L.J., Grist, A., Knowles, T.G. and Gibson, T.J., 2022. A systematic review of equid welfare at slaughter. Livestock Science, 263, p.104988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2022.104988
Payne-Gifford, S., Whatford, L., Tak, M., Van Winden, S. and Barling, D., 2022. Conceptualising Disruptions in British Beef and Sheep Supply Chains during the COVID-19 Crisis. Sustainability, 14(3), p.1201. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031201
Pope, H., De Frece, A., Wells, R., Borrelli, R., Ajates, R., Arnall, A., Blake, L.J., Dadios, N., Hasnain, S., Ingram, J., Reed, K., Sykes, R., Whatford, L., White, R., Collier, R. and Häsler, B. 2021. Developing a functional food systems literacy for interdisciplinary dynamic learning networks. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, p.747627. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.747627
Arnold J, Whatford L, Gabain I, Tak M, Van Winden S, Barling D, & Haesler, B. 2021. Exploring the barriers and incentives towards effective surveillance for antimicrobial and anthelmintic usage (AMHU) in beef cattle and sheep in Great Britain. RVC Research Online: https://doi.org/10.34840/3r19-fc05
Arnold J, Whatford L, Gabain I, Tak M, Van Winden S, Barling D, & Haesler, B. 2021. AMHU Surveillance GB Beef Cattle And Sheep Research Brief 2021. RVC Research Online: https://doi.org/10.34840/AX5J-EJ54
Chapot, L#., Whatford, L#., Compston, P., Tak, M., Cuevas, S., Garza, M., Bennani, H., Bin Aslam, H., Hennessey, M., Limon, G. and Queenan, K., 2021. A global media analysis of the impact of the covid-19 pandemic on chicken meat food systems: Key vulnerabilities and opportunities for building resilience. Sustainability, 13(16), p.9435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169435 # authors have equal contributions
Hennessey, M., Whatford, L., Payne-Gifford, S., Johnson, K.F., Van Winden, S., Barling, D. and Häsler, B., 2020. Antimicrobial & antiparasitic use and resistance in British sheep and cattle: a systematic review. Preventive veterinary medicine, 185, p.105174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105174
Louise teaches on the BSc in Biological Sciences (Animal Behaviour, Welfare and Ethics), Bioveterinary Medicine degree, and the BVetMed degree covering topics on ethics, welfare and systesm thinking. She supervises undergraduate and MSc projects in animal health, welfare and ethics as well as One Health, antimircobial resistance and Systems thinking. Covering species from hedgehogs to sheep. Louise is also a leader of the Sitational Analysis and Systems thinking module on the MSc One Health course.
She has a Postgraduate Certificate in Veterinary Education and is a Fellow of the Higher Education Academy.
-
Ethics of animal use and management
Animal welfare issues often arise when there are conflicts of interest between humans and animals. This poses challenges around whose interests to prioritise, and what actions can be taken to produce the best moral outcome. The needs and wants of human, animal, and even environmental stakeholders must be understood and evaluated to decide what is the right course of action, but different ethicists and stakeholders may disagree about the conclusions of any ethical analysis. For example, unnecessary suffering must not be caused to legally protected animals, but what counts as ‘suffering’, when is it really ‘necessary’, and which animals should be protected? Evidence must be gathered and some consensus must be agreed upon as to weight the different possible actions.
-
Evaluation of the implementation of the UK Antimicrobial Resistance National Action Plan in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The project aims to evaluate the implementation of the UK Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) National Action Plan (NAP) 2019-2024 to contribute to the development and implementation of future AMR policy and adjustment of current implementation plans.
AMR is a global threat; microorganisms with resistance genes can spread through the movement of people, animals, food, soil, air, and water. In addition, some resistance genes can be directly transferred between microorganisms.
-
Interdisciplinary Food Systems Teaching and Learning (IFSTAL)
The food system is not functioning the way it should anymore, IFSTAL is designed to bring about the systemic change that the food system requires in order to limit the negative outcomes its currently delivering and prepare for the future.
IFSTAL is an interactive training programme designed to improve knowledge and understanding of the food system. It brings together expertise and experience of faculty and students from five leading higher education institutions (RVC, LSHTM, SOAS, The University of Oxford and The University of Warwick). IFSTAL addresses the urgent lack of a workforce skilled in food systems thinking.
-
Sustainable Beef & Sheep Food Systems
This project brings together different disciplinary and One Health specialists from two collaborating universities; the Royal Veterinary College and the University of Hertfordshire to contribute creatively to solutions for more sustainable beef and sheep production and marketing systems in Great Britain.
Using trans-disciplinary, systems modelling approach we aim to map the British beef and sheep food systems and identify metrics of sustainability for each farming system to create an integrated model to assess impacts.