RVC Website: | Home | Courses | Higher Degrees | Research | Clinical Services | RVC Enterprise | About Us | Contacts | Search |

SML  >  Research Projects

Evolution of Dinosaur Body Shape and Locomotion

Video 1: Movie showing the 3D modelling procedure that we used; here featuring the large dinosaur Allosaurus.


Video 2: Movie showing all 17 of our computer models, in evolutionary sequence from furthers to closest in relationship to living birds.

Videos may play best in Internet Explorer and with Flash plugin. Alternative versions on Youtube here and here.


See our Images and Videos page for more!

Insights from RVC-based study using 3D computer models

Luis Rey concept art

Research our team (detailed below) has published today (Wednesday 24 April 2013), in the journal Nature, used realistic three-dimensional computer models of the skeletons and bodies of dinosaurs and their relatives to show how body shape changed during dinosaur evolution and its consequences for the way dinosaurs, including their bird descendants, stood and moved.

Our study reveals for the first time that, contrary to prior studies, it was the enlargement of the forelimbs over time, rather than the shortening and lightening of the tail, that led to bipedal (two-legged) dinosaurs gradually adopting an unusually crouched posture, with the thigh (femur) held nearly horizontally – a trait that was iinherited by their descendants: birds (see images below).

We used scanning or digitizing technology to create 3D images of the skeletons of 17 archosaurs (land animals including living crocodiles and birds as well as extinct dinosaurs), then digitally added “flesh” around the skeletons to estimate the overall shape of the body as well as the individual body segments such as the head, forelimbs and tail.

Dr. Vivian Allen, first author on the paper, says, “We basically started from a simple digital 'shrink-wrap' of the whole skeleton. From this, we expanded the 'shrink-wrap' to match how we much flesh we think existed around the different parts of the skeleton. This was based on both detailed reconstruction of the muscular anatomy of each animal, and on what we have measured from CT scans of their living relatives. 'Accuracy' can be a misleading term in reconstructing extinct animals, but this approach gave us a repeatable and scientifically-sound estimate for the size and shape of these animals as they were in life, not just as skeletons."

3D laser scan of the dinosaur Allosaurus, used in the study
Above: 3D laser scan of the dinosaur Allosaurus, used in the study. By Vivian Allen.

Limb posture and centre of mass are linked

Prior research had shown that the first archosaurs, around 245 million years ago, were superficially like modern crocodiles - four-legged animals with long, heavy tails, although with longer limbs for living and moving on land. However, early in the evolution of the dinosaur lineage, about 235 million years ago, dinosaurs became bipedal, a trait inherited by their descendants: birds. As noted above, birds stand and walk in an unusually crouched posture, with the thigh (femur) held nearly horizontally (see Figure 1c); unlike the more vertical limbs in humans, for example. A good example contrasting human and avian limb postures is shown below (image courtesy of Nina Schaller):

Ostrich-Human posture comparison

Palaeontologists had agreed for years that this strange way of moving in birds had evolved gradually as the tail became shorter, shifting the centre of mass of certain dinosaurs progressively forward as those dinosaurs became more “bird-like”, and thereby requiring the legs to become less vertical and more crouched to keep the centre of mass balanced over the feet (see Figure 1 below).

posture explanationFigure 1: Animal standing or at the midpoint of a step (a). For the animal to balance, forces applied by the feet (red) must match the force of body weight (blue) pointing downwards from the centre of mass (yellow/black). If the centre of mass moves forward (b), then the feet must move forward (and thus the limb must get more crouched) to maintain balance, as in (c).



Prof. John Hutchinson, who led the study, says: “Our results surprised even us: it wasn’t primarily the shortening and lightening of the tail that drove the change in dinosaur centre of mass and thus posture, but rather the enlargement of the forelimbs. Birds (flying dinosaurs) obviously have large forelimbs for flight. But dinosaurs close to the origin of birds enlarged their forelimbs for reasons other than powered flight, such as prey capture or negotiating complex terrain. These enlarged forelimbs became noticeable in animals such as the famed feathered dinosaurs Microraptor and Velociraptor, as well as the earliest bird, Archaeopteryx.

“We’d never doubted the hypothesis that the tail was responsible for the major changes in dinosaur balance and posture. The tail is the most obvious change if you look at dinosaur bodies. But as we analyzed, and re-analysed, and punishingly scrutinised our data, we gradually realized that everyone had forgotten to check what influence the forelimbs had on balance and posture, and that this influence was greater than that of the tail or other parts of the body.”

Vivian Allen adds, “We had set out to simply use modern, computer-aided techniques to illustrate how and when the centre of mass changed its position in dinosaurs, because the timing of that change had been controversial: either gradual, or more sudden and associated with the first birds and the origin of flight. We found some support for both scenarios: there were gradual changes early on in dinosaurs, but we were amazed by how much the increase in forelimb size began altering the centre of mass just before when flight may have first evolved, in early birds and their closest relatives.”

Initial microCT scan of the Chinese fossil bird Yixianornis, used in our study.
Above: Initial microCT scan of the Chinese fossil bird Yixianornis, used in our study.

Implications

A major, unexpected implication of our discovery is that, due to the effects on centre of mass position on leg posture, forelimb size and leg function are biomechanically linked. So, these changes in the forelimb anatomy of dinosaurs, both before and after flight, also altered the way they stood, walked and ran.

Coauthor Karl Bates adds, “The evolution of birds from their dinosaurian ancestors is historically important not only to dinosaur research but also to the development of the theory of evolution itself. Way back in the 1860’s, Thomas Huxley used Mesozoic dinosaurs and modern birds as key evidence in promoting Darwin’s theory of evolution. In this study, modern digital technologies have allowed us to quantify the ‘descent with modification’ observed by Huxley all those years ago. This quantifiable evidence, derived from fossils, helps make evolution more apparent to a general audience, and helps demonstrate exactly how scientists understand what they do about evolution.”

Prof. Hutchinson concludes, “What was great about this project for us is that we were able to reconstruct the evolution of whole body dimensions in extinct animals in a quantitative way for the first time, and yet that way was honest about how much we don’t know about those dimensions. However, all that uncertainty ended up not mattering so much- there were clear patterns in changes in dinosaur body dimensions even when considering all the unknown factors. I really like the challenge of tackling such problems in science. It’s gratifying when you feel you’ve done your best to be very cautious and a cool discovery emerges from the hard work everyone put in. And anyone can join in the fun-- we’ve shared all the major methods and 3D images from our study (on the Dryad website) so others can use them for any purpose. It’s a win for dinosaur fans and scientists.”

What's next?

The centre of mass of dinosaurs only tells us what the limbs had to support; in other words, what demands the body placed on them for balancing. The big missing piece of the puzzle, then, is how the muscles acted and evolved to act to support the changing centre of mass. The bones already suggest major changes in those muscles' positions, sizes and activities, as prior studies by our and other groups have shown. We are using 3D biomechanical computer models like the ones shown below (ostrich on the left, Tyrannosaurus on the right) to reconstruct how muscle support evolved in dinosaurs and what postures particular animals might have favoured, which could reveal more detail about how limb posture and locomotor behaviours evolved in dinosaurs. Watch this space!

Ostrich computer model of hindlimb Tyrannosaurus computer model of hindlimb

Acknowledgements

We thank the NERC and Royal Society for funding! Other acknowledgements of individuals and museums that helped us to gather our data are in the paper.

NERC Royal Society                   

 

Our team

 

Vivian AllenKarl BatesZhiheng LiJohn Hutchinson
Left to Right: Vivian Allen, Karl Bates and T. rex, Zhiheng Li, John Hutchinson.

Learn more!

  • See images and videos from this research here.
  • Read the paper: Vivian Allen, Karl T. Bates, Zhiheng Li & John R. Hutchinson. 2013. Linking the evolution of body shape and locomotor biomechanics in bird-line archosaurs. Nature, published online here. doi:10.1038/nature12059
  • Watch the video by Nature about the study here.
  • Read and discuss more about the paper at John Hutchinson's blog post here.
  • Download the data from the project at the Dryad website here!
  • Common questions or misconceptions about our study:
    • We did not establish how particular dinosaurs moved in any precise way. Our models show where the centre of mass might have been, and biomechanical theory predicts that a centre of mass that lies closer to the head, further from the hips, requires a more crouched posture to support it stably. See the explanatory image above.
    • We made our models by scanning whole skeletons (laser/CT scans) and then digitally adding flesh around the skeleton in several different configurations to create a range of possible body shapes for each animal, accounting for the unknown anatomies of extinct animals. This method had been shown to be reasonably accurate in our prior studies, using living animals such as crocodiles and birds. It is as reliable a method as is currently scientifically possible. Video 1 at the top of the page shows our procedure.
    • Our models were all placed in the same limb posture, to standardize comparisons of centre of mass. This then allowed us to infer, in qualitative terms only, how the posture would have become more crouched as the centre of mass moved forwards.
    • We studied 17 species of archosaurs (see this link for definition; essentially it is a broad group that includes living crocodiles, birds, extinct dinosaurs, pterosaurs, and other animals, along with all descendants of their most recent common ancestor); 1 crocodile and 1 dinosaur-relative called Marasuchus are archosaurs but not dinosaurs. The remaining 15 animals we studied were all dinosaurs; birds are known to be living dinosaurs.
    • Please do not use the misleading term "missing link" in reference to any of the fossils we studied.

Other experts to contact (not a comprehensive list):

Designed and developed by the RVC Electronic Media Unit